Important points to consider:
- Clearly define the objectives and the process to be followed during the actual review and QC
- Who on the clinical and project submission teams are involved in the review and the QC - of course the medical writer and the QC data controller are involved throughout the lifetime of the document under development
- How many review cycles are needed
- How many QC cycles are needed
- How will the review comments be tracked
- How will the review comments be resolved
- Who will resolve the review comments
- Check to see if the review comments are implemented and implemented correctly
- Follow the same considerations for outlining the process for QC comments
- For each review and QC cycle, no comment should be left without resolution - this includes, data, text, statement, interpretation, conclusion or an action item
- Submission medical writers and QC data consultants must always interact directly with clinical or expert decision makers in resolving comments and QC findings - this to avoid uninformed intermediaries that may not have credible, accurate, decisive resolutions to positioned comments.
Moving the document ahead with Quality is essential. Changes must be tracked and resolved. Lead the team and manage the comments, track the resolutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment